Due to its isolation in terms of foreign policy over most of 2014 Bulgaria was mainly placed within the passive supporters’ category, regarding common European politics. The freezing of the South Stream project and the difficulty for this country to maintain that decision, unlike other member-states have turned Bulgaria into a leader at the diversifying gas dependence away from Russia category. These are the results from the 5th annual report of the Foreign Affairs Council, named European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2015. The scorecard is a sort of rankings under a systematic annual assessment of the EU’s work with the rest of the world. The assessments of the separate countries within the European foreign policy are in the categories “leader”, “supporter” and “slacker”, depending on whether they develop or hamper the union’s readiness to defend its interests on certain goals. Director of the European Policies programme of the Open Society Institute and author of the analysis Marin Lessenski commented the subject exclusively for Radio Bulgaria:
“The most important thing is that Bulgaria is already taking its due place as a member-state and starts voicing its position on European issues. Thus it is now one of the factors within the decision-making process of the EU. 2014 was a really tough year, as far as home policy was concerned, with 3 governments alternating. That was why the foreign policy assessment of this country was really hard. The good thing is that Bulgaria is not lagging behind; it has been qualified as a supporter of EU policies in most cases – a positive development on previous years. Now we are also a leader in one of the surveyed areas – the energy sector. However, Bulgaria is expected to be more active on subjects of special interest for it, such as the EU expansion and the Balkans. It can take here a more active stance and can be precisely what it is required to be – a leader, heading the European foreign policy in the region. Few EU member-states can do that, in terms of diplomatic authority and resources.”
The assessment is made on what’s been really completed as policy and certain resources and not on attitude or intentions, Mr. Lessenski pointed out.
For instance, we have got used to seeing Bulgaria as “underdeveloped”, as far as the “humanitarian aid and support for other countries” criteria is concerned. However, when one looks from the outside, it is a developed country, in view of third countries and countries in a conflict situation – it is expected to provide aid and it really does, the expert says. The important thing about this assessment is whether something is good for the EU’s greater good then respectively – for the national interest.
“A survey shows that in most cases, in almost 100 percent of those the national stances of the member-states on the subjects viewed coincide. To be precise – on the conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Syria… So, from this point of view, it was a good year for the union’s foreign policy. It’s a different matter what the result is and if the goals set are achieved. Unfortunately we see that the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria are ongoing. This comes to show that it is hard to achieve the results we want. Bulgaria remembers the war in neighboring Yugoslavia back in the 1990s – it was a long one, hard to end and with lasting negative consequences. This country’s economy suffered, there were political consequences and some issues still remain unsolved. The lesson is that the reaction should be timely and be demonstrated by all member-states.”
In the words of Foreign Minister Daniel Mitov in 2014 the challenges before the EU increased and got more complicated. “Europe faces numerous hot conflicts, instead of one Cold War”. What about the start of the new 2015?
“The start of the year is more than alarming. Europe’s internal terrorist threat after the Paris assault has been escalating. However, it is linked to an external conflict – the one with the Islamic State. We also witness an escalation in Ukraine. So, 2015 is a really tough one and Europe will face many challenges in the course of the year.”
English version: Zhivko Stanchev
''If the Constitution is not amended, there is no point in holding another election under the same rules and with the same bought, controlled and corporate vote'', the co-chairman of the parliamentary group of BSP-United Left Borislav Gutsanov said in..
The first sitting of the newly elected National Assembly has ended. As in the last three Bulgarian parliaments, the election of a speaker proved to be a serious challenge, as neither of the two candidates - Raya Nazarian of GERB-SDS and Andrei Tsekov of..
The residents of the Bulgarian-populated region of Taraclia and the Gagauz Autonomous Area in the Republic of Moldova voted over 90% "no" in the October 20, 2024, referendum, where Moldovan citizens were asked if they approved Constitutional amendments..
The coalition We Continue the Change-Democratic Bulgaria (PP-DB) , which came second in the October 27 parliamentary elections, has accepted an invitation..
A new party called Bulgaria Can (Bulgaria Mozhe) was founded today. Its leaders are the political and economics analyst Kuzman Iliev and the former MP..
GERB leader Boyko Borissov has sent a letter to the We Continue the Change-Democratic Bulgaria (PP-DB) coalition proposing a way out of the political..
+359 2 9336 661